Comparación de tres pruebas serológicas para detectar infecciones por Paragonimus mexicanus en gatos infectados / Comparison of three serological tests to detect Paragonimus mexicanus infections in infected cats

Introducción: La paragonimiasis es una enfermedad pulmonar causada por tremátodes del género Paragonimus. Generalmente, el diagnóstico de laboratorio de la infección en humanos se realiza mediante la detección de huevos del parásito en esputo o heces; sin embargo, los resultados pueden ser negativos, necesitándose métodos diagnósticos alternativos. Objetivos: Comparar tres pruebas serológicas para la detección de anticuerpos contra el antígeno somático del estadio adulto de Paragonimus mexicanus (PmAS) en muestras de suero de gatos infectados experimentalmente. Diseño: Estudio experimental. Lugar: Bioterio del Instituto de Medicina Tropical ôDaniel A. Carriónõ de la Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Material biológico: Gatos domésticos de 4 a 6 meses de edad y antígeno somático crudo de P. mexicanus (PmAS). Intervenciones: Se obtuvo muestras de sangre de 12 gatos domésticos infectados experimentalmente con P. mexicanus. Los sueros fueron evaluados por el inmunoensayo enzimático (ELISA), la doble difusión (DD) y contrainmunoelectroforesis (CIEF). Principales medidas de resultados: Se determinó el porcentaje de gatos que revelaron resultados positivos de acuerdo a los criterios establecidos. Resultados: Se encontró una buena correlación entre los resultados obtenidos por ELISA y aquellos obtenidos por CIEF o DD. La CIEF y el ELISA fueron más sensibles que la doble difusión. Con la CIEF y el ELISA, 81,8 por ciento (9/11) y 75,0 por ciento (9/12) de los sueros evaluados dieron resultados positivos, respectivamente, mientras que 58,3 por ciento (7/12) de ellos fue positivo para la DD. Los sueros de 2 conejos con fasciolosis experimental dieron una reacción positiva con el antígeno PmAS por ELISA y CIEF. No se observó reacción cruzada cuando se usó sueros de gatos con dipilidiasis o de gatos sanos. Conclusiones: Estos resultados indican que la CIEF y el ELISA, que emplean antígeno somático crudo, son pruebas de similar sensibilidad para el diagnóstico de paragonimiosis, pero no pueden ser usadas para el diagnóstico diferencial de las infecciones por P. mexicanus y F. hepatica, debido a la ocurrencia de reacciones cruzadas.

Background: Paragonimiasis is a lung disease caused by Paragonimus trematodes genus. Human infection laboratory diagnosis is usually done by detection of parasite eggs in sputum or feces; however, findings may be negative and alternative diagnostic methods are required. Objectives: To compare three serologic tests for detection of Paragonimus mexicanus somatic antigen (PmAS) antibodies in serum samples of cats infected experimentally. Design: Experimental study. Setting: Instituto de Medicina Tropical ôDaniel A. Carriónõ bioterium, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru. Biologic material: Domestic cats 4-6 years old and P. mexicanus (PmAS) crude somatic antigen. Interventions: Blood samples were collected from twelve domestic cats infected with P. mexicanus. Serum samples were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), double diffusion (DD) and counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE). Results: Good correlation was found between ELISA results and those of CIE or DD. Both CIE and ELISA were more sensitive than DD. With CIE and ELISA sera were respectively positive 81.8 per cent (9/11) and 75.0 per cent (9/12), whereas 58.3 per cent (7/12) were positive for DD test. Sera from 2 rabbits with experimental fascioliosis had positive reaction with PmAS antigen by both ELISA and CIE tests. No cross-reactivity was observed using sera from cats with dipylidiasis or from healthy cats. Conclusions: Results showed that both ELISA and CIE were equally sensitive tests for paragonimiosis diagnosis but could not be used for differential diagnosis of P. mexicanus and F. hepatica infections due to cross-reaction.

Frequency of human toxocariasis in a rural population from Cajamarca, Peru determined by DOT-ELISA test.

The aim of this study was to estimate the frequency of human toxocariasis in Cauday district, Cajamarca, Peru, using a dot-ELISA test. From June to October 2005, a total of 256 adult subjects were studied. Blood samples were collected for serology by a dot-ELISA test and for hematological examination. Parasitological examination was also carried out in stool samples to check cross-reactions in the dot-ELISA. The frequency observed was 44.92%, with a significant higher proportion of positivity in male subjects. From subjects with positive serology, 45.6% had respiratory symptoms, 40.44% abdominal pain, 32.35% hepatic symptoms, 14.7% cutaneous signs, 13.23% ocular manifestations, 43.38% eosinophilia, and all of these were statistically associated to serology. Among the population evaluated, 90.23% (231/256) were parasitized. From subjects with positive serology, 92.17% had at least one intestinal parasite and the most frequent were: Blastocystis hominis (68.38%), Giardia lamblia (28.68%), Hymenolepis nana (20.0%), Ascaris lumbricoides (15.65%), Entamoeba histolytica/E. dispar (13.24%), Cyclospora cayetanensis (4.41%), Cryptosporidium sp. (1.47%), Enterobius vermicularis (0.87%), Strongyloides stercoralis (0.87%), Taenia sp. (0.87%), and Trichuris trichiura (0.87%). The rate of false positives in the dot-ELISA test was improved by serum absorption each with A. suum antigens, with a decrease of cross-reactions. In conclusion, human toxocariasis is highly frequent in this population and some risk factors like dog/cat ownership, presence of pets within house, and previous history of geophagia were observed in the present study.

Frequency of human toxocariasis in a rural population from Cajamarca, Peru determined by DOT-ELISA test / Freqüência de toxocaríase humana numa população rural de Cajamarca, Peru, mediante o uso do teste DOT-ELISA

The aim of this study was to estimate the frequency of human toxocariasis in Cauday district, Cajamarca, Peru, using a dot-ELISA test. From June to October 2005, a total of 256 adult subjects were studied. Blood samples were collected for serology by a dot-ELISA test and for hematological examination. Parasitological examination was also carried out in stool samples to check cross-reactions in the dot-ELISA. The frequency observed was 44.92%, with a significant higher proportion of positivity in male subjects. From subjects with positive serology, 45.6% had respiratory symptoms, 40.44% abdominal pain, 32.35% hepatic symptoms, 14.7% cutaneous signs, 13.23% ocular manifestations, 43.38% eosinophilia, and all of these were statistically associated to serology. Among the population evaluated, 90.23% (231/256) were parasitized. From subjects with positive serology, 92.17% had at least one intestinal parasite and the most frequent were: Blastocystis hominis (68.38%), Giardia lamblia (28.68%), Hymenolepis nana (20.0%), Ascaris lumbricoides (15.65%), Entamoeba histolytica/E. dispar (13.24%), Cyclospora cayetanensis (4.41%), Cryptosporidium sp. (1.47%), Enterobius vermicularis (0.87%), Strongyloides stercoralis (0.87%), Taenia sp. (0.87%), and Trichuris trichiura (0.87%). The rate of false positives in the dot-ELISA test was improved by serum absorption each with A. suum antigens, with a decrease of cross-reactions. In conclusion, human toxocariasis is highly frequent in this population and some risk factors like dog/cat ownership, presence of pets within house, and previous history of geophagia were observed in the present study.

O propósito do presente estudo foi estimar a freqüência da toxocaríase no distrito de Cauday, Cajamarca, Peru, usando o dot-ELISA teste. Entre junho e outubro de 2005, um total de 256 pessoas foram avaliadas. Coletaram-se amostras de sangue para o teste de dot-ELISA e para o exame hematológico e amostras de fezes para exame parasitológico. A freqüência geral de anticorpos anti-Toxocara observada foi de 44,92%, com maior proporção significativa de positividade em pessoas do sexo masculino. Das pessoas com sorologia positiva, 45,6% apresentavam sintomas respiratórios, 40,44% dores abdominais, 32,35% moléstias hepáticas, 14,7% sinais cutâneos, 13,23% manifestações oculares, 43,38% eosinofilia e todos estes fatores foram estatisticamente associados à sorologia. Entre as pessoas avaliadas 90,23% estavam parasitadas e 92,17% das pessoas com sorologia positiva tinham algum parasito intestinal, sendo os mais freqüentes: Blastocystis hominis (68,38%), Giardia lamblia (28,68%), Hymenolepis nana (20,0%), Ascaris lumbricoides (15,65%), Entamoeba histolytica/E. dispar (13,24%), Cyclospora cayetanensis (4,41%), Cryptosporidium sp. (1,47%), Enterobius vermicularis (0,87%), Strongyloides stercoralis (0,87%), Taenia sp. (0,87%) e Trichuris trichiura (0,87%). A taxa de falsos positivos no teste dot-ELISA foi melhorada pela absorção dos soros com antígenos de A. suum, com diminuição das reações cruzadas. Em conclusão, a toxocaríase humana é altamente freqüente nesta população e fatores de risco como ter um cão/gato, presença dos animais dentro de casa e estória prévia de geofagia foram observados durante o presente estudo.